ZombieTown

In continuing my exploration into zombie tabletop gaming, I decided to give ZombieTown a spin. From the reviews I knew that this was one best played with more people, and thankfully I had a set of patient friends willing to fill out a six player session. Unfortunately I didn’t anticipate the poorly written rules that turned the entire night into one big confusing… something. I want to say “tornado,” but that implies fast, which it was not.

The primary objective of ZombieTown is territory control. The zombie hoard is spreading out from the cemetery, and you need to secure the homes of the town before they get overrun. At the end of the game, you get points for the number of homes you control. Unfortunately the rules for transferring control are confusing. It’s not enough to be present in the home; you need to either erect a barricade or post a survivor in order to technically get credit. Survivors die quickly and barricades are easy for other players to bypass, so you’ll definitely see control switching around a lot. Unfortunately the rules aren’t so crisp about what happens in these scenarios. Intuitively I would think that control means you have a warm body in the house, and that barricades exist to keep it that way, but apparently it’s not so simple.

Combat is resolved by drawing cards instead of rolling dice. In theory the card determines the range of your shot, but in a six player game there are so many zombie moves between your turns that combat is almost always a reaction of a close range attack. And even if you are being aggressive, you’re better off firing your gun in close quarters because the odds are against a ranged hit. Thematically it’s a little odd to have all these guns, but not be able to pick off zombies before they’re on top of you.

The biggest flaw in ZombieTown is that there are no rules to keep defeated players in the game. If you die early in the evening you just have to sit and watch until the game is over. Given that the whole point of a board game is to give some friends something to do together, this is flat out unacceptable. Give the player a point penalty, bring them back as a zombie… just do anything to keep them involved. It’s no fun to sit on your duff while everyone else keeps on playing.

If there’s one trend I’d like to kill, it would be games where the rules are in a book when they should be on the cards. There are cards in ZombieTown that have nothing but a picture on them. You have to go look at the rules sheet to figure out how that card works. There are also rules about “event” class cards, but there’s no indication on the cards themselves about what’s an event and what is not. Sure, after you’ve played the game many times you won’t need to fish around the rules to figure out what a card means, but until then it’s a huge barrier to entry.

Some of the rules of ZombieTown seem a little half baked, with a great example being the barricades. These come in varying strength, with each given a number that determines how many zombies it can keep at bay. According to the official rules, you’re supposed to keep that number hidden. I guess the goal is to prevent other players from strategizing about exactly how many zombies they need to divert to take down a house. The bizarre thing is that barricades can have traps as well, but if the strength number is hidden then the trap number is clearly visible. I’d think I was reading the rules wrong, but the cards are not designed in a way that would allow you to hide the trap number. This was the only rule that was so obviously impossible to follow that we immediately threw it out the window.

I’m truthfully trying to be reserved with the criticism I’m giving here, because I don’t think I can say with confidence that I’ve actually played ZombieTown yet. I’ve played some interpretation of it, but given the outcome I’m sure that we got several parts wrong. It’s not like Zombies!!!, which was so broken out of the box that I had to go get alternate rules before it was any fun. No, ZombieTown may be awesome as it was intended, but I still need to go online to figure out exactly how to play it. I’m not ready to write it off entirely, as that I really do like a lot of the ideas behind it, but I’m going to let this one sit until I can do some hardcore research.

Shoot 'Em Up

There are some action movies that feature a rich storyline where rampant violence is contextually appropriate. But most are riddled with half-baked plots that are a weak excuse for a series of action set pieces. There’s nothing inherently wrong with that, unless they take that plot seriously, which for some reason almost all of them seem to do. Thankfully some action movies realize that the whole genre is ridiculous and leave the plot behind entirely. Of course your enjoyment of these is gated by whether you can consider excessive violence funny.

Shoot ‘Em Up is bound to be a polarizing movie. It’s intentionally shallow and gratuitous. There’s a plot, I guess, but it only kicks in after you’re already knee deep in over the top gunfight choreography. And if you think a movie of guns and one-liners sounds awesome, then you will enjoy Shoot ‘Em Up. If you don’t, chances are you’ll be mortally offended. There’s not much more I can write to sway you one way or the other, because all of the quality of this movie is visual and/or contextual. I guess I could describe it as a cousin of Hot Fuzz but darker and less obviously funny, if that helps. Or you can just go watch a trailer. Or I could just sum it up with one statement: “multiple vegetable-related fatalities.”

I guess what I’m trying to say is that if you’re jaded and desensitized like me, Shoot ‘Em Up is freaking awesome.

Myers-Briggs

I think I was in middle school the when I took a test to find out my Myers-Briggs personality type. It’s the sort of thing they made people do to figure out what career they were best suited for. Hell if I can remember what I tested as, although I can say with confidence that it started with an “Introversion.” Well, a lot of time has passed since then, and we have this whole internet thing, so thankfully you can go take a Myers-Briggs approximation online in no time.

This time around I tested as an INTJ. I can’t compare that to my younger self, but my guess is that I haven’t changed much. Certainly the Judging/Perceiving dichotomy is the most loaded of the four pairs, as that I doubt few people would rather be designated as “judging.” But apparently it refers to your preference for structure, which I’ll concede that my neuroses require. I think I might have fallen more on the open ended “P” side when I was younger, but I’ve probably benefitted from the slip (at least professionally). But I wonder if there’s a natural personality progression here. Kind of like becoming set in your ways, which for me is the most terrifying aspect of Becoming Old.

Of the four temperaments I’m placed with the Rationals, which apparently are in short supply (6%). That means that 94% of the people out there are irrational, right? Well, at least the description seems to match me pretty well. I do oppose to my specific designation of Mastermind, which of course implies that I should live in an underground lair somewhere. In general I’m in the same bucket as a bunch of boring scientists, but I do take comfort that I have the company of both Hannibal Lector and Gandalf the Grey.